All in a loaf of bread?

Dr. Schindler has forever changed my way of thinking. I go to class on Tuesday afternoons and walk out feeling like my entire life has been flipped upside down...
I am an advocate for buying fewer things at a higher cost for two reasons. One, I want to purchase things of good quality and two, I want to know that whoever made what I am buying has been paid a fair wage. I do not do this because I am a socialist but because I believe that everything has an order. When you buy something, you are buying a way of life (so Dr. Schindler tells us)! In one sense, that seems very overwhelming but in another, there is something beautifully simplistic about it. To buy, for example, a loaf of bread from the family owned bakery of your local community as opposed to a loaf of bread that has been mass produced from the grocery store (one that has been pumped full of preservatives, among other crap, to the point where the only thing "bready" left in it, is its basic appearance) allows us to a promote a Catholic culture that is to say, a culture of love by this one small action. One cannot deny that our economy espouses a self-interest mentality. If man is made in the image and likeness of God (who is Trinitarian) then man must be made for communion and his existence is ultimately, that of gift. What does this have to do with bread you may curiously ask? Hang on for just a moment. Although I am no economist, I just don't see how Catholics who really want to live as people of the beautiudes can support an economy of self interest. (I won't even get into the argument of neo-conservative Catholics, another blog entry maybe). Adam Smith, one of the fathers of American economics, tells us in his Wealth of Nations: "It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest. We address ourselves, not to their humanity but to their self-love, and never talk to them of our own necessities but of their advantages." Is this what we are to expect from humanity? It seems so degrading. Economics built off of self-interest is not concerned with the human person but with efficiency, that is to say, with time and money. I realize that there is more to it than that, that an economy of self-interest is suppose to work mutually towards and benefit the other's self-interest but is this the best we can do? I don't believe it. The point I am trying make is that, according to Dr. Schindler, in doing something as simple as spending the extra bit of money on the loaf of bread from the family owned bakery (or spending the extra time to make it yourself) promotes a more Christ-like economy. We can change the culture one loaf of bread at a time!!


4 Comments:
Chris was talking about this at St. Lawrence on Thanksgiving. Very interesting.
Well...here is it my dear friend...my first comment on your blog...I couldn't resist replying to this entry, because I too was deeply moved by yet another Schindler class. As we both know, since coming to the Institute all is now seen through new eyes - and I am so thankful that a discussion about a loaf of bread can touch my heart and challenge me to live out more deeply the call to "relationship" in my own life. Keep doing what your doing on this blog site, cause if you do, no one will ever have to labour under misapprehensions again!!! xo
I like reading your blog because it contains many fascinating insights (I was deeply inspired by the "Be Who You Are" entry) but this one raises many questions I'm hoping you will address in a future entry. (Disclaimer: I'm not tyring to be a wise-guy. Your observations are common in American Catholicism (in which I include myself) and I'm just probing the reasoning behind it)
1) Is your objection to buying mass-produced bread as opposed to local-bakery bread based on the quality of the bread or who owns it? A grocery store may be family owned, and nothing prevents a family-owned bakery from cutting corners, of course. And the extra money you give to the more expensive bread is less money you give to other businesses and workers.
2) What are the characteristics of a Christ-like economy and how do you know when you have one? Is an economy judged to be moral based on the intention of the people participating in it or in it's actual results?
As a sidenote, economics is the study of scarce resources that have alternative uses, and a sub-study is how to distribute such resources to where they are most needed. A system that distributes resources according to justice has proved to be elusive. The USSR, China, etc., have tried to but their attempts have been met with mass-starvations with regard to food (hardly something Christ would advocate, I think). Free-market capitalism is not the product of rational thought, but rather a tool that has evolved over the history of humanity, similar to farming. There's nothing moral about farming in and of itself. It's just a tool that has allowed its practitioners to survive and reproduce better than hunters and gatherers. Likewise, societies that adopt free-market capitalism (or some mildly socialist variants) are much better at supporting larger populations (this is a function of how quickly resources can be distributed when the market changes due to natural disasters, changing tastes, etc.). If a free-market capitalistic economy (like Adam Smiths) based on self-interest does much better at distributing resources than its alternatives is it correct to judge it immoral?
Anyway, just some thoughts late at night. Keep up the blog and please post regularly.
Julie! You're taking me back to last year :) All of this stuff is so complicated, "there's much to be sorted out here." Keep up the enthusiasm and let's sort it out! Always remembering that love in this world is sononymous with crucifixion.
Post a Comment
<< Home